The End of Section 321: What it Means for Retail Supply Chains 

news globe and container ship, representing the announcement of the end of the de minimis provision

Posts flooded LinkedIn this week after Wednesday’s big White House announcement.  

“De minimis is over for all…”  

“I thought de minimis would be enabled for non-China goods until July 2027. Today we learned not.”  

“The loophole is over.” 

“Such a massive change.” 

Although brands thought they had more time to adapt supply chains to emerging realities, the timeline has shrunk significantly. As of August 29, 2025 (unless changed again), Section 321’s de minimis provision is suspended. 

The fallout could be serious for many brands, particularly those with low-value goods. And with a reduced timeline to prepare, retailers must look at the potential effects on their operations and take action now, especially if they are dependent on the de minimis loophole.  

It’s not just Shein and Temu that will feel the pressure, but any apparel, accessories, household goods, and other ecommerce brands. 

Section 321 and why it mattered 

Since the 1930s, Section 321 of the U.S. Tariff Act has allowed imported goods valued at $800 or less to enter the country duty-free under a provision known as de minimis

Originally used to reduce administrative burden for the government, the exemption evolved to make it easier for overseas retailers to ship products directly to U.S. consumers without facing customs duties or taxes. As online shopping boomed, the policy became a major enabler of fast, inexpensive cross-border ecommerce, particularly for lightweight and low-cost consumer goods. 

The loophole was especially beneficial to ultra-low-cost platforms like Temu and Shein, which shipped vast volumes of small parcels directly from China to American doorsteps without triggering import fees. By avoiding traditional customs channels, these retailers could offer rock-bottom prices and still maintain reasonable delivery timelines. U.S. businesses, meanwhile, argued they were at a disadvantage, forced to comply with stricter trade requirements while facing a flood of duty-free imports undercutting domestic pricing. 

In recent years, the use of Section 321 exploded. According to the White House, over 309 million de minimis shipments have entered the U.S. so far this fiscal year, which is nearly triple the 115 million recorded just a year prior. This surge, combined with growing concerns over trade imbalances, unfair competition, and safety, set the stage for the policy’s removal and a major shake-up for global ecommerce operations. 

What’s changing and when  

According to the White House announcement, Trump’s executive order eliminates de minimis benefits for all countries on August 29. Even goods shipped through postal networks now face tariffs. 

Goods are now subject to: 

  • Country-of-origin duties 
  • Tariff classifications 
  • Full customs processing 

Other administration surprises 

To complicate things further, Trump also announced another series of trade deals and demands, eliciting surprise. These trade maneuvers, aimed at reshaping global commerce, include new tariffs of 15% on South Korean goods and 25% on Indian imports, with the latter facing added pressure due to ties with Russia. Countries like Thailand, Cambodia, and Taiwan are in talks for bilateral agreements, while Malaysia and Brazil received mixed signals on future levies. The moves come as Trump seeks to apply tariffs ranging from 15% to 50% on nations without trade deals, pushing for more domestic manufacturing and leverage over trade partners. 

Markets responded with volatility: copper prices plummeted after tariff exemptions on certain forms, while Asian shares and currencies dipped. The rollout has created confusion among global investors and policymakers, with many deals lacking key details. Talks with China remain cautiously optimistic, while trade tensions escalate over geopolitical disagreements; and now a 35% tariff on goods from Canada and rates above 30% on nations from South Africa to Switzerland. The accelerated timeline and broad reach of the policy shifts mark a major upheaval for global trade dynamics. 

Immediate impacts on retailers and DTC brands  

The immediate implications are far reaching. To start, goods that have benefited from the de minimis provision will be subject to tariffs, which could mean that customers will either pay more or buy less. There’s also the question of whether customs is prepared to handle the increase in goods its processing, driving a potential increase in customs clearance requirements, clearance delays, additional brokerage fees, added paperwork and tracking. Cross-border DTC brands will face longer lead times and increased landed costs. 

The suspension of the de minimis provision will send ripples through retail supply chains. Smaller ecommerce brands and niche product businesses that relied on low-cost, cross-border shipping to stay competitive will need to navigate new challenges. Without duty-free thresholds, these businesses face new complexities around customs compliance, tariff classification, and inventory planning. Many may struggle to absorb the added costs or navigate the required documentation, particularly those without in-house logistics teams.  

The change also raises broader questions:  

  • Will air freight become less attractive due to higher per-unit values?  
  • Will ocean freight absorb more of the volume?  
  • Which regions will see the biggest fulfillment disruptions?  

As brands reevaluate their fulfillment strategies, many are exploring onshoring or reshoring to mitigate risk, reduce tariff exposure, and improve delivery times. The shift may benefit domestic 3PL partners, but it also demands that brands act quickly to avoid inventory gaps or escalating costs as the policy takes effect. 

How U.S.-based fulfillment partners help retail brands adapt  

3PL offers are already flowing: Come to our webinar! Discounted onboarding costs! Book a meeting with our tariff expert! 

While it’s tempting to power forward to protect operations, brands should still take their time when choosing fulfillment partners to help them adapt to the policy changes. And it’s not incorrect to want to be agile in the current commerce climate. Sellers dependent on ultra-low-cost shipping should reconsider U.S. market strategy. Retailers with U.S.-based fulfillment will gain an edge on shipping time and predictability. A shift toward U.S.-based inventory and fulfillment is a hedge against tariffs. And time is of the essence. That said, choose wisely. 

The right 3PL partnership will help with duty-paid, tariff-compliant inventory staging, inventory buffering to minimize out-of-stock risks, and labeling and compliance support. A partner that stands out, or is differentiated, meets the unique needs of each brand and is invested in outcomes. 

For example, Kase’s national footprint makes domestic fulfillment cost-efficient. Regulatory and compliance expertise and global partnerships support brands in handling customs. Real-time visibility tools help clients monitor landed cost impact and SKU velocity. A dedicated customer support team empowered to solve problems fast with no rigid scripts or unnecessary red tape; just real people making decisions to keep your business moving. 

Rethinking your supply chain strategy post-Section 321  

Retail brands will need to move now to make important decisions prior to August 29. Some key questions to ask are: 

  • Where is your inventory stored? 
  • Are your SKUs tariff-sensitive? 
  • Can you afford longer shipping timelines and customs delays? 

Beyond the actions that experts are promoting (e.g., reshore, use domestic fulfillment, move your manufacturing to the U.S.), there are benefits to hybrid models, especially in the beginning of the transition. Keep some inventory offshore and some staged in U.S.; and use regional distribution centers to maintain fast delivery. 

Competitive retailers are already repositioning inventory. While it’s critical not to make an impulsive decision, it is time to rethink strategy and operations. Try to look at Section 321’s end as an opportunity to both build a more resilient supply chain and to future-proof against tariffs. Brands that invest in U.S. warehousing now will be better positioned for growth and compliance moving forward. 

Connect with Kase to evaluate your exposure, explore warehouse space, and build a smarter fulfillment strategy before the policy goes into effect. 

About the Author

author's image

Alyssa Wolfe

Alyssa Wolfe is a content strategist, storyteller, and creative and content lead with over a decade of experience shaping brand narratives across industries including retail, travel, logistics, fintech, SaaS, B2C, and B2B services. She specializes in turning complex ideas into clear, human-centered content that connects, informs, and inspires. With a background in journalism, marketing, and digital strategy, Alyssa brings a sharp editorial eye and a collaborative spirit to every project. Her work spans thought leadership, executive ghostwriting, brand messaging, and educational content—all grounded in a deep understanding of audience needs and business goals. Alyssa is passionate about the power of language to drive clarity and change, and she believes the best content not only tells a story, but builds trust and sparks action.